Building Types
60x100 Livestock Barn
- Width
- 60 ft
- Length
- 100 ft
- Floor area
- 6,000 sq ft
- Perimeter
- 320 ft
Use
How a 60×100 Livestock Barn May Be Used
Equipment shelter
Machinery clearance height and door width are usually the limiting factors, not floor area.
Commodity and forage
Bulk storage depth against the sidewalls affects how the building is loaded and unloaded.
Drive-through access
End-to-end access lets equipment pass through without reversing.
Seasonal working space
Open floor is commonly kept for repairs and staging between seasons.
Example
Example Configuration
Quick dimensions
At a Glance
Width
60 ft across the gable end.
Length
100 ft along the sidewall.
Floor area
6,000 sq ft of clear floor.
Eave height
18 ft at the sidewall on the stored profile.
Configuration
How This Building Is Configured
Configuration summary
| Building type | Livestock Barn |
|---|---|
| Footprint | 60 ft × 100 ft |
| Floor area | 6,000 sq ft |
| Eave height | 18 ft |
Planning
Footprint & Space Planning
Footprint
Width and length are chosen together: width is usually fixed by what has to fit side by side, length by how many bays are needed.
Height
Eave height affects door options, storage height and how open the interior feels.
Access
Where vehicles and people enter changes the whole interior layout, so access is settled before anything else.
Doors and openings
Opening width, height and position are specified with the supplier; they affect the frame and the wall bracing.
Site
Slope, drainage, access for delivery and erection, and the foundation are confirmed for the actual property.
Expansion
Extending along the length is usually simpler than changing the width later, which is worth deciding up front.
Access
Doors & Access Considerations
Opening width
Across a 60 ft gable end, the practical opening width is limited by the frame and confirmed with the supplier.
Opening height
A 18 ft eave sets the ceiling on door height before any frame change.
Drive-through
Matching openings at both ends avoid reversing, at the cost of usable wall.
Similar sizes
Other Sizes for a Livestock Barn
Related
Related Building Types
Example configuration — for planning purposes only.
FAQ
Common Questions
60 ft × 100 ft is 6,000 square feet of floor area before any interior partitions.
Length is usually adjusted in bay increments, and width is a larger design change. Both are confirmed with the supplier for the final design.
Site preparation, foundation and erection are commonly quoted separately from the building package. Confirm the scope of any quote you receive.
Compare nearby sizes
Related footprints for this building type
Each page works through one footprint for one building type.
Overview
A 60x100 livestock barn planned as a barn housing stock at one end and feed or bedding at the other
This page is ordered around the boundary between the housed end and the stored end, because keeping the two apart is what makes one building serve both.
The footprint holds 4 housed bays — 2 across by 2 deep — and leaves 18 feet of depth for a buffer bay between the stored material and the animals, keeping dust, vermin and machine traffic away from the housed end.
What distinguishes 60x100 is depth behaviour: 2 rows along 100 feet after 14 feet of circulation, with 18 feet unaccounted for at the end of the run. Temperature swing on a steel shell drives condensation decisions that outrank most layout preferences.
A 60 by 100 footprint is a clearly directional plan: 6,000 sq ft enclosed by 320 ft of wall, at a 1.7:1 length-to-width proportion. Along its 100 ft dimension it takes 2 runs of housed bays at 34 ft, leaving 32 ft over — the 32 ft is where the argument about this size actually happens. Taken purely as arithmetic, 60 by 100 gives 1 housed bays across the 60 ft dimension once 14 ft is reserved for movement, and 2 deep along the 100 ft dimension. Run as a a barn housing stock at one end and feed or bedding at the other, 20 ft across is enough to be worth planning: a buffer bay between the stored material and the animals, keeping dust, vermin and machine traffic away from the housed end Space allowances, ventilation and welfare provisions are determined for the specific operation with veterinary and design input rather than by building type.
At 60x100 the operating question is a specific one: where is the line between the housed end and the stored end, and does anything protect the animals from what happens on the other side of it? That is a different question from the one a livestock barn of another shape has to answer, and it is why this footprint is planned as a barn housing stock at one end and feed or bedding at the other rather than as generic covered area.
Areas, perimeter, roof area, ridge height, slab volume and the housed bay counts on this page are computed from the stored 60x100 record and this platform's planning module for the livestock barn category.
Configurations
Configuring 4 housed bays at 60x100
Nominal bay division computes to 4 bays at about 25 feet, narrower than the 26-foot module — so frame lines land inside positions and the interior has to be set out from the columns. Set the openings before the interior, because the openings cannot move and the interior can.
Two-plus rows change the access question entirely. Every rear position at 60x100 needs either its own opening or an aisle, and 8 feet of spare width is what that aisle has to come from. Where the building sits on the site changes how much of this floor is genuinely reachable.
The stored end extends, because it is the end with machine access and the end whose demand grows with the herd rather than with the building.
Configured as a barn housing stock at one end and feed or bedding at the other, 60x100 is judged on whether the 4 housed bays it holds match the operation, and on whether the 8 feet of spare width leaves the route this mode depends on.
- Does the work need four lanes across, or two lanes flanking an interior work hall, or does it need a second lane that this 60-foot span cannot give?
- Is the 100-foot length being bought for depth, or for the repeated bays — eight to ten repeated bays, which makes the layout a scheduling problem as much as a spatial one?
- How does air move through the barn on a still day?
- Can the cleaning machine work the full alley without moving animals twice?
Bay division shown here is a planning module computed from the stored length. Actual bay spacing is set by the manufacturer's frame design for the building.
Openings
Openings for 2 housed bays across
One opening per position works on this gable: 2 across 60 feet, with 8 feet of wall to distribute as piers. Splitting that margin evenly is what keeps the elevation buildable. Fire separation, egress and occupancy are determined for the specific building and can reshape this plan entirely.
The 60 ft ends and the 100 ft sides offer very different opening budgets: 60 ft of end wall has room for one wide opening or two modest ones, while 100 ft of side wall can carry several without the openings competing. On this plan the deciding factor is whether mixed housing and storage barn or buffer bay should be the first thing reached from the door.
Animals loaded through a handling route at one end; feed and bedding delivered to a different point entirely.
Framed-opening sizes, headers and the structure around them are engineered for the specific building. Confirm every opening with the door supplier and the building manufacturer before ordering.
Allocation
Dividing the floor for a barn housing stock at one end and feed or bedding at the other
The housing pattern this barn could equally be planned around is open group housing where animals move freely within a bedded area: there is no bedding reserve inside, so bedding arrives from outside on the day it is needed and in the weather it arrives in. Stock at the sheltered end, storage at the access end, buffer between. Storage placed at the far end means every load is driven the length of the building past the animals.
Because 18 feet clears the 12 feet this platform treats as usable, the end of the run is a room rather than a gap: 1,080 square feet for a buffer bay between the stored material and the animals, keeping dust, vermin and machine traffic away from the housed end. The count of working positions, not the headline area, is the figure that survives contact with the operation.
Spare width is the more valuable of the two leftovers here: a continuous 8-foot strip beats the same area stranded at the end of the run, because it touches every position along the way. Access, not area, is what makes a plan feel small once it is in use.
Spent as a square 77 by 77 instead, the same 6,000 sq ft would stand 2 housed bays across rather than 1, and would trade this plan's length for parallel access. That is the width-against-depth decision this footprint has already made. Compared with a 60 by 80 of the same width, the extra depth here adds run rather than reach: it buys about 2 housed bays in line, and every position past the second is retrieved by moving what stands in front of it. At this size the building becomes a shared resource, and shared resources need a written rule for who parks where and which door is kept clear. Two routines run in the same building at different rhythms: daily stock work and intermittent bulk handling. Their routes should not cross, which is a door and layout decision rather than a scheduling one. Bedding and feed arrive in weather that makes them hard to move, so where they are stored is a labour decision. That movement pattern, not the 6,000-square-foot total, is what decides whether the leftover 18 feet is useful here.
Usable area
How the 6,000 square feet divides at 60x100
Computed housed bay fit for a 60x100 livestock barn
| Measure | Computed at this footprint |
|---|---|
| Housed bays across the 60-foot width | 2 at a 26-foot module |
| Leftover width | 8 ft (800 sq ft as a full-length strip) |
| Rows along the 100-foot length | 2 at a 34-foot module after 14 ft of circulation |
| Leftover depth | 18 ft (1,080 sq ft across the width) |
| Total housed bays | 4 |
| Share of floor committed | 59% |
Module footprint used here is 26 by 34 feet, this platform's planning module for a livestock barn. It is not a code minimum or an engineered clearance.
Example allocation of the 100-foot length — planning model, not survey data
| Zone | Length along the building | Computed area |
|---|---|---|
| Stalls and animal housing | 45 ft | 2,700 sq ft |
| Aisle and handling space | 30 ft | 1,800 sq ft |
| Tack, feed and storage | 25 ft | 1,500 sq ft |
Shares applied to the stored 100-foot length; areas computed against the 60-foot width.
Module footprints and allocation shares come from this platform's use typology and are published as example planning models. They are not recommendations and do not describe a majority of projects.
Height
Interior height for a 60x100 livestock barn
The stored configuration carries a 18-foot eave and computes to 25.5 feet at the ridge on a 3:12 pitch — a 7.5-foot rise across 60 feet. Height is therefore not uniform, and the sidewall is the constraint. Snow, wind and site exposure change what this shape costs to build long before the interior plan does.
Height on a 60 ft span is a separate decision from the 100 ft length, and it is the span that sets the frame's behavior. Raising the eave over 6,000 sq ft affects every bay along the 100 ft dimension, so the test is whether mixed housing and storage barn genuinely needs the extra clear height or only the floor area.
Ventilation across 6,000 square feet at this height: air quality above the animals is the defining requirement of the building, and it drives ridge, eave and sidewall decisions together.
Clear height below purlins, bracing and lighting is lower than the eave height. The usable figure comes from the manufacturer's framing for the selected building.
Comparison
What changes at adjacent footprints
Computed comparison of nearby footprints for a livestock barn
| Footprint | Floor area | Housed bays |
|---|---|---|
| 30x80 | 2,400 sq ft | 2 (1 x 2) |
| 40x60 | 2,400 sq ft | 9 (3 x 3) |
| 50x50 | 2,500 sq ft | 8 (4 x 2) |
| 40x70 | 2,800 sq ft | 4 (2 x 2) |
| 30x100 | 3,000 sq ft | 3 (1 x 3) |
Areas computed from each stored size record; housed bay counts computed with the same 26 by 34 foot planning module.
- 30x80 moves the count from 4 to 2 housed bays (1 across by 2 deep), which is the reason to choose between them.
- 40x60 moves the count from 4 to 9 housed bays (3 across by 3 deep), which is the reason to choose between them.
- 50x50 moves the count from 4 to 8 housed bays (4 across by 2 deep), which is the reason to choose between them.
Nearby footprints read for a livestock barn: exact change in area and in planning housed bays
| Footprint | Area Δ | % Δ | Housed bays at that footprint | What changes for this use |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 80x80 | +400 sq ft | +6.7% | 6 (3 x 2) | +2 housed bays on the same planning module. |
| 50x100 | −1,000 sq ft | −16.7% | 6 (2 x 3) | +2 housed bays on the same planning module. |
| 60x120 | +1,200 sq ft | +20% | 12 (3 x 4) | +8 housed bays on the same planning module. |
| 60x80 | −1,200 sq ft | −20% | 2 (2 x 1) | −2 housed bays on the same planning module. |
Areas are arithmetic on two stored size records; housed bay counts use this platform's 26 by 34 foot planning module and are not a capacity statement.
Because this footprint is planned as a barn housing stock at one end and feed or bedding at the other, the useful next reads are different from the ones a differently shaped livestock barn suggests: mixed housing and storage barn, buffer bay, separated access ends.
Visualization
Reading the 60x100 footprint as a livestock barn
FAQ
Questions about 60x100 livestock barn projects
About 1,080 square feet across the width — enough for a buffer bay between the stored material and the animals, keeping dust, vermin and machine traffic away from the housed end.
Reserving 14 ft across the 60 ft dimension for movement leaves 46 ft of working width, which takes 1 housed bays at 26 ft. Along 100 ft it takes 2 runs at 34 ft. That is 2 positions out of 6,000 sq ft, and the remainder is circulation, walls and the margin every plan needs. Whether that count is enough depends on where is the line between the housed end and the stored end, and does anything protect the animals from what happens on the other side of it. These are planning figures computed from the footprint, not a quoted layout.
It depends on the cleaning machine working inside with its bucket raised, not the animals. The stored configuration computes to 25.5 feet at the ridge, but the eave is the number that governs anything standing near a wall.
The storage end, so bulk traffic never travels the length of the housed area. Placing access at the stock end guarantees machine traffic past the animals every day.
The footprint holds 4 housed bays — 2 across by 2 deep — and leaves 18 feet of depth for a buffer bay between the stored material and the animals, keeping dust, vermin and machine traffic away from the housed end. Those counts use a 26 by 34 foot planning module with 14 feet allowed for circulation, so a different module changes the answer.
Methodology
How this page was produced
Sources and methodology
Find Steel Buildings dimensional records
Find Steel Buildings · Primary platform dataset · Tier 1 — code authority, standards body, primary dataset or manufacturer engineering
Supports: Stored nominal width, length, eave height, roof pitch and slab thickness for this subject.
International Building Code and International Residential Code
International Code Council · Model code · Tier 1 — code authority, standards body, primary dataset or manufacturer engineering
Supports: The framework of adopted codes and local amendments that decides permitting, separation and opening requirements. Cited as the governing framework, never as a local requirement.
- Dimensional figures: Width, length, eave height, roof pitch and nominal slab thickness come from this platform's stored record for the subject. Floor area, perimeter, wall area, roof area, ridge height and slab volume are computed from those inputs rather than transcribed.
- Housed bay fit: Counts, leftover strips and per-module areas are computed from the stored 60x100 record against this platform's 26 by 34 foot planning module for the livestock barn category, with 14 feet allowed for circulation. The module is editorial planning typology, not a code minimum or an engineered clearance.
- Allocation model: Zone shares come from this platform's use typology for equine housing and riding space and are applied arithmetically to the stored 100-foot length.
- Allocation and layout models: Layout splits are arithmetic on the stored footprint, published as example allocation models. They are not survey findings and do not describe what buyers most often choose.
- Clearance and opening guidance: Clearance and opening statements are planning guidance. Final dimensions depend on the selected door system, header detail and the manufacturer's engineering for the building.
Methodology notes
- Prices: No price figure appears on this page. Cost data is published on this platform only with a documented inclusion basis, a collection date and a named source.
Cost drivers
Quantities that move the estimate at 60x100
No price appears on this page. The quantities that scale an estimate at 60x100 are 6,000 square feet of slab, 111.1 cubic yards of nominal concrete, 5,760 square feet of wall cladding and 6,185 square feet of roof cladding. The mezzanine that is added afterwards is the change order that reprices the frame.
One shell serving two purposes is the saving; the buffer, the second opening and the separation are the costs that make the saving work rather than merely look like one.
- ventilation provisions and sidewall openings
- interior pens, gates and durable linings
- the alley width the cleaning machine needs
- drainage and washdown provisions
Drawn to scale
Plans and dimensions
Every drawing below is generated from the exact dimensions for this building, so proportions and areas are accurate.
Continue your research
Related planning topics
Background reading on the questions this page raises. None of these pages sells anything.
Compare 60x100 livestock barn configurations
Review the allocation models for this footprint side by side, then estimate the configuration you intend to build.